Flow
How a cohort actually runs
We borrow from editorial calendars more than software sprints: fixed deadlines, visible redlines, and short written retros. Here is the path most teams follow after they enquire.
Before · messy briefs
PDFs with mismatched UTMs, creative folders named FINAL_v9_really, and exclusion lists living only in someone’s head.
After · boring clarity
Shared diagrams, named owners per arrow, and a stop rule taped beside the monitor — not glamour, just fewer surprises when spend turns on.
- Step 1 — Enquiry triage
Admissions reads for risk flags (impossible timelines, missing decision makers) before we schedule a call.
- Step 2 — Fit call
30 minutes: map your tools, name blockers, pick a program or hybrid bundle.
- Step 3 — Pre-work
Light reading plus one diagram exercise so day one starts mid-thought, not from zero.
- Step 4 — Lab weeks
Live critiques, quiet async blocks, and shared boards with explicit “do not target” columns.
- Step 5 — Ship checklist
You export UTMs, naming, and QA notes into whatever system your org already tolerates.
- Step 6 — Retro email
We send a short retro prompt; replies feed the next syllabus refresh.